tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3545886534042322597.post4607801118921730510..comments2007-11-22T07:18:08.478-08:00Justin Peasehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00062669138144919279noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3545886534042322597.post-13044594101380548602007-11-22T07:18:00.000-08:002007-11-22T07:18:00.000-08:00Initial indications show that Merb does in fact use less memory than Rails, and perhaps serve up more requests with the smaller footprint than Rails.Justin Peasehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00062669138144919279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3545886534042322597.post-71685408899481110932007-11-22T01:00:00.000-08:002007-11-22T01:00:00.000-08:00I'm starting to get interested with Merb. The thing that puts me off about Rails is they bundle everything including the kitchen sink. I'd rather select the ORM, Javascript library etc that I wish to use rather than being told what I can use. I've had all sorts of headaches deploying rails sites due to their memory usage, it would be interesting to hear how well Merb fairs in the memory department. I think Rails is great, but I believe Merb has a very promising future.Garthhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10573068971994975758noreply@blogger.com